2014.12.14."Negative" and "Imaginary" are meta, i.e. in ourselves the subjects

From complementary pairs in The "Zero" vs the "One" like Gravity vs other forces and Time vs Space, and from "Imaginary/Off-diagonal" parts in QM's Wave = Observer's information, I've drawn the following conclusion on the way home just right before stopping in front of my house.
 * The "negative" and the "imaginary" are meta we created to complement the "positive" and the "real" in order to make the system complete.
 * So, if the "positive" and the "real" are of the observed object then the "negative" and the "imaginary" are of the observing subject. Wow, at last I get back to the original meaning of the "imaginary"! That's because I usually say "The Real numbers are no real; Naturally the Natural numbers are real, and technically the Complex numbers are real." So in my holistic view, the Complex is real as a hole, exactly like the meta is as real as the object because we are real objects in the universe.
 * And the imaginaries in the sign of Time (in spacetime) and in the QM's matrices are exactly the meta in our mind, i.e. in our measuring apparatus.
 * So, if by changing the point of view, via "hybrid coordinates", I've eliminated the negative/imaginary in spacetime, then maybe the same trick can be done with the wave functions?!


 * : Wow, it looks good, but hope that I will have time to read it!