2014.12.03.A week of Freedive, Uniinfo, Self, Quantum/The "self" and the "form"

The self and the form are very similar to each other, but looking closely they are different.
 * The self of A := the perfect A. It's absolutely a meta and contains all of its contradiction inside.
 * The form of A := the common of all instances of A. It's in the object world, and is a part of the intension which is complement with the content. In timeline, the "common" of all moments is the "constant".


 * The "perfect" certainly includes the "common/constant" but not exclusively. The "perfect" also includes the "consistent" and the "complete" --> contradiction in itself. In the meta world (its head) the self is perfect, but looking back to the object world, i.e. "itself", it's imperfect. And that imperfection + perfectionism is the force of all "change" or "motion".


 * Normally we can only recognize a self (and ourselves) by observing the forms! <-- That's the "attachment to the form/shape" in Buddhism. And without attachment to the form, the self disappears altogether, no more imperfection/perfectionism, no more contradiction, no more "suffering"! However, living in this world, we must take some form, thus "must" deal with the self. There are 2 ways of viewing the Universe:
 * Object view: No meta, just objects! So there's no self, just causes and effects, just analytic laws like Newton's laws of motion.
 * Meta view: Everything is metaized from the first 3 elements! So everything has its own self ==> The intergral perfectionist/optimalist laws like "conservation laws". But while "conservation laws" deal with unrelated circles (material), the perfectionism law of the self deals with the network of circles and arrow (structured objects, or categories).